Pourquoi je suis un progressiste

These days, I read a column by Thomas Friedman from October 2012 titled “Why I am Pro-Life“. Since (I think) he is a left-wing democrat, the title draws attention. But what exactly is Friedman trying to say? According to him, one cannot claim to be himself ‘pro-life’ and be against common-sense gun control, social policies to the most disadvantaged, etc. etc. Thus, Friedman is saying that he is presumably more “pro-life” than many alleged “pro-life” republicans.

As a Brazilian, I don’t feel particularly identified with neither Republicans nor Democrats. However, despite what we might think about the two mainline American parties, I do understand Friedman’s effort to ‘take ownership’ of a label which has clearly a positive sense (as he says, “the term ‘pro-life’ should be a shorthand for respect for the sanctity of life”). I’m not saying Friedman is right, but his effort reminds me of a similar label misuse in Brazilian public sphere: the appropriation of the label “progressive” by Brazilian anti-religious left.

Personally, I don’t identify myself with organized political groups, whether they be progressives  or conservatives. As labels, both adjectives mean nothing. It all depends on what you want to progress, or what you want to conserve. However, it seems clear that the term progressive has much more positive a connotation than its opposite (at least in Latin America). Although such semantic charge is, in most part, defined historically by a long process of sedimentation, I think that, generally and as a matter of principle, citizens living in democracies have more positive reactions with the label “progressive” than with “conservative”.

Despite the fact that I don’t sympathize with progressive groups any more than I do with conservative ones, I know that my positions in moral issues would be labeled as conservative or right-wing by most of Brazilian intelligentsia. However, just as Friedman, I think this is a gross distortion. Even though there are plenty of anti-liberal and anti-modern catholics, I think most catholics have, in general, a sympathetic disposition to accept Modernity and its project of an neutral and secular political order (for more on this issue, I would recommend this excellent text of Fr. Martin Rhonheimer).

Having a sympathetic disposition to accept Modernity and a secular order is perfectly compatible with an intransigent defense of life (from conception), marriage and family. In fact, I would go further: the defense of life, marriage and family is not only compatible with the acceptance of Modernity, but is also grounded on it. Thus, it strikes me as a huge distortion that the Brazilian anti-religious left can label these positions as conservatives. It is a distortion that pro-abortion and pro-redefinition of marriage positions have nowadays the monopoly of the label “progressive”. If by “progressive” we understand the willingness to promote a radically inconditional conception of human dignity, then nothing seems more progressive than the defense of unborn humans and children. That’s exactly what the Catholic Church does.

Advertisements
Standard

3 thoughts on “Pourquoi je suis un progressiste

    • Mateus Silva says:

      Caro Nox,
      Mais uma vez, estamos às voltas com o problema da (re)apropriação dos termos. Embora você se defina como conservador, é possível que tenhamos uma concepção de mundo muito mais próxima do que, por exemplo, eu teria com outra pessoa que se intitulasse progressista. Como você viu no texto, defino-me “progressista” num sentido limitado e que depende de uma concepção específica do que é a Modernidade. Uma vez, num congresso, ouvi um debatedor dizendo que os evangélicos neopentecostais negam a Modernidade, pois, ao aceitar a intervenção constante de Deus no mundo criado, rejeitariam a ideia de causalidade presente na maior parte das ciências naturais (estou simplificando bastante). Eu nunca havia pensado em Modernidade nesse sentido, e não sei se é uma boa definição. Mas o fato é que é diferente do que costumo entender por Modernidade.

      De todo modo, para muitas pessoas, minhas posições são bastante conservadoras, risos. 🙂

      Mateus

      • Certamente esses conceitos são um tanto fluidos, mas quando me defino como conservador não é usando a conotação popular dessa palavra, praticamente sinônima de “reacionário”, mas no sentido que a reflexão político-filosófica de um Burke, um Russel Kirk ou um Roger Scruton consolidou.

Deixe seu comentário.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s